观察小针刀联合穴位埋线治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床效果。方法：研究对象选取2020年9月至2021年3月，因颈椎病来我院就诊的患者。采用随机数字法将患者分为两组。一组住院后采取小针刀联合穴位埋线的方法，另外一组入院后采用单独小针刀治疗的方法。 结果：共86 例神经根型颈椎病患者纳入本研究。小针刀联合穴位埋线治疗神经根型颈椎病患者的总有效率为90.7%，单纯针刀治疗组的治疗有效率为83.7%。两组的差异具有统计学意义（P=0.0372）。小针刀联合穴位埋线治疗神经根型颈椎病的痊愈率为67.4%，小针刀组的治愈率为53.5%。小针刀联合穴位埋线治疗神经根型颈椎病在提高痊愈率方面更具优势（P=0.023）。小针刀联合穴位埋线组的患者术后一周后VAS 评分开始低于单独小针刀治疗组患者。在术后1周之内，两组患者的VAS评分没有统计学差异。在术后1个月时，两组的差异很明显（P=0.0165）。结论：小针刀联合穴位埋线方法治疗神经根型颈椎病是一种有效的治疗方法，效果要优于单独小针刀治疗，值得临床推广。

Objective: To observe the clinical effect of small needle knife combined with acupoint embedding in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Methods: The study subjects were selected patients who came to our hospital due to cervical spondylosis from September 2020 to March 2021. The patients were divided into two groups by random number method. One group was hospitalized with a small needle knife combined with acupoint embedding method, and the other group was treated with a small needle knife alone after admission. Results: A total of 86 patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy were included in this study. The total effective rate of small needle knife combined with acupoint embedding in the treatment of patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy was 90.7%, and the effective rate of the treatment group was 83.7%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.0372). The cure rate of small needle knife combined with acupoint embedding for the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy was 67.4%, and the cure rate of the small needle knife group was 53.5%. Small needle knife combined with acupoint thread embedding for the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy is more advantageous in improving the recovery rate (P=0.023). The VAS scores of the patients in the small needle knife combined with acupoint embedding group started to be lower than those in the small needle knife treatment group one week after the operation. Within 1 week after surgery, there was no statistical difference in VAS scores between the two groups. At 1 month after surgery, the difference between the two groups was obvious (P=0.0165). Conclusion: The small needle knife combined with acupoint embedding method is an effective treatment method for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, and the effect is better than that of the small needle knife alone. It is worthy of clinical promotion.